Posts: 717 Location: Winchester, VA
Fri 02 May, 2008 3:27 am
| Hugo Voisine wrote: |
| Quote: | | While not an expert on Viking blades I'm not sure where the idea came from that the fuller needs to end under the guard. I don't believe that the termination of the fuller at the hilt is even taken up in Geibig's classification system, nor can I tell from just looking at the photos from my copy of "Swords of the Viking Age" whether or not all of the fullers in the book do terminate under the guard. Some of the swords are so corroded it really is impossible to tell. Plus I'm sure the swords in Ian Peirce's book represent only a small sample of surviving Viking era swords. Just because we haven't seen it doesn't mean that it didn't happen or wasn't made that way. For instance Geibig type 1 blades " . . . often lack a fuller and have flat faces (p.21, SotVA)". All of the type 1 blades in Peirce's book have fullers. |
Maybe historically speaking the fuller doesn't need to end under the guard on all viking swords, but I think that from a marketing point of view, considering the reactions here and pretty much everywhere when a new viking/saxon sword model comes off, this sword would probably sell better if the fuller extended a bit under the guard, or at least had a less abrupt end. |
Hugo. I agree with you completely. This sword will sell better with a slightly modified fuller. I just want people to keep in perspective that this desire for a fuller that extends under the guard seems to be derived more from a modern trend than historical necessity.
Of course looking at the small selection of examples the extended fuller does seem to be farely typical, if not common place. And for most people, especially it seems reenactors, common place is what they want. I guess I'm just someone who appreciates and wants a little more "historical diversity" in modern reproductions.
Posts: 1,903 Location: Toronto
Fri 02 May, 2008 4:14 am
This is getting off the original topic, but I am not yet convinced that abrupt, visible fuller terminals were an historical feature of viking swords. One argument above seemed to be 'we have not seen them, but that does not mean they didn't exist'. Of course that is logically correct, but one can use that to support any claim...including the existence of green eyed dragons with purple wings. This is the realm of faith. The realm of science is the burden of proof - to show that something did/does exist.
So, can anyone cite historical examples of viking swords with fullers like this? Then I will believe.
Posts: 9,545 Location: Dayton, OH
Fri 02 May, 2008 4:45 am
Folks,
Earlier in this thread, Tinker said (several times) that his method of putting the fullers in leaves the abrupt termination, but that the production swords will have fullers that run under the guard. So it's a non-issue.
If anyone wants to discuss historical examples with abrupt fuller terminations, please start a new thread. This one is about this sword. Thank you.
Posts: 365 Location: Seattle, Wa.
Fri 02 May, 2008 6:31 am
Thank you Chad! I was getting tired of repeating that...
Posts: 625 Location: Louisiana / Nordrhein-Westholland
Fri 02 May, 2008 10:52 am
Wow, that looks like a great steal for the price range. I have one question though, is the tip of the blade the final version? It just seems a tad pointy.
If so, perhaps i could shape and sharpen the blunt re-enactor.
Posts: 519 Location: 831
Fri 02 May, 2008 11:28 am
Good looking sword... the only problem I personally have is seeing your makers mark the rune 'T' on a Chinese made sword, will they also have a number on the other side too?
Only a suggestion from a collector/user who owns a 7 of your swords, mark these Chinese made swords differently so it does not confuse collector/users who want to buy a real Michael "Tinker' Pearce custom sword, not every c/t or future c/t is aware of the rune 'T' and number process you use on the other side of the blades you personal make.
Posts: 365 Location: Seattle, Wa.
Fri 02 May, 2008 12:49 pm
| Ian Hutchison wrote: |
Wow, that looks like a great steal for the price range. I have one question though, is the tip of the blade the final version? It just seems a tad pointy.
If so, perhaps i could shape and sharpen the blunt re-enactor. |
There were pointy Viking swords; examples are pretty easy to find.
Negative on reshaping the blunt, though- it has a 2mm rounded edge and it would be almost as much work to turn into a sharp as it would be to grind a new blade- and then the balance etc would be off. You'd be better off rounding the last inch or so of the sharp.
Posts: 365 Location: Seattle, Wa.
Fri 02 May, 2008 12:51 pm
| Ben Sweet wrote: |
Good looking sword... the only problem I personally have is seeing your makers mark the rune 'T' on a Chinese made sword, will they also have a number on the other side too?
Only a suggestion from a collector/user who owns a 7 of your swords, mark these Chinese made swords differently so it does not confuse collector/users who want to buy a real Michael "Tinker' Pearce custom sword, not every c/t or future c/t is aware of the rune 'T' and number process you use on the other side of the blades you personal make. |
No worries, Ben- I made this prototype so it has my maker's mark on it. The Chinese swords will NOT have my maker's mark.
Posts: 2,307 Location: Croatia
Sat 03 May, 2008 4:18 am
[quote="J.D. Crawford"]
| Luka Borscak wrote: |
| I just looked a bit through my Records of the medieval sword, and there are quite a few swords that have a fuller that begins below the cross, so it shouldn't be a big problem even if you don't change it... |
I think it depends on the type. Which ones were you looking at?
From memory, I don't recall any Viking blades in Ian Pierce's book that show an abrupt visible fuller termination (although I can think of at least one that showed a gradual shallowing toward the guard).
I admit, these were not viking swords. Xa, XIIIa and XIIIb, I think.
Posts: 356 Location: Chicago, IL USA
Tue 06 May, 2008 2:14 pm
Re: Here's the 'Blunt'
| Douglas S wrote: |
| Michael Pearce wrote: |
These requirements call for a 2mm rounded edge, a very rounded point and the best 'historical appearance' obtainable within these limits while still remaining in the weight and balance range for period swords of this type. |
Which groups are you conferring with? Regia Anglorum requires 3-5mm. |
Most groups I encountered over the years, particularly those outside of the UK, are 2mm. A 3 - 5mm sword edge is simply absurd.
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You
cannot reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot vote in polls in this forum
You
cannot attach files in this forum
You
can download files in this forum