| Author |
Message |
|
Alessio J. Orlandi
Usergroups: None
Location: Bologna, Italy Posts: 33
|
|
|
 |
Glennan Carnie

|
Posted: Sun 13 May, 2012 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
You need to sort the neckline out. It's really pretty awful.
I'd be tempted to inset the sleeve more. Set the armhole higher; particularly under the arm. You could achieve a much tighter / sleeker fit by doing this, without sacrificing mobility.
|
|
|
 |
|
Jens Boerner
Usergroups: None
Location: Erlangen, Germany Posts: 62
|
Posted: Mon 14 May, 2012 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Way more waist. You whatever you did, you can see the stitches from the interlining(?) on the outside. Ain't historical.
|
|
|
 |
|
Alessio J. Orlandi
Usergroups: None
Location: Bologna, Italy Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue 15 May, 2012 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glennan, in which way should I sort it out? Should I make it more slender or what?
Jens, for what I know there are no clear evidences about how italian arming doublets where made. The whole thing is just an hypothesis. My idea was: it should look more or less like a common civilian doublet, but for sure must be stronger and maybe safer. So I made this kind of crossover between an italian farsetto and a gambeson. That's why stitches are visible. Of course, one could always sew the layers of interlining and THEN cover everything with an exterior, more elegant lining. About the waist, I should more probably lose some weight :P Of course one could "inflate" more the chest, but this thing is to be used under a milanese armour and I need some room to breathe.
|
|
|
 |
|
Kel Rekuta
|
Posted: Wed 16 May, 2012 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alessio,
Regardless of what the re-enactors have to say, I rather like your farsetto. It may not be as perfect as some people expect but the effort you put into it is commendable. It is exactly the sort of arming coat I am looking for and there are no commercial versions of anything like it available. My vote is well done!
|
|
|
 |
Tölgyes Tamás

|
Posted: Thu 17 May, 2012 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alessio J. Orlandi wrote: | | About the waist, I should more probably lose some weight :P |
Read back, on this page you can see a (historically unaccurate) doublet by Adam Bodorics. He's about 100-110 kg (230-240 pounds).
|
|
|
 |
|
Alessio J. Orlandi
Usergroups: None
Location: Bologna, Italy Posts: 33
|
Posted: Thu 24 May, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've seen it, but that really looks bizarre to me... I mean, he must have a really thin waist if you compare it to the hips. I can increase the ratio chest/waist by adding more padding, but there is no way to increase the ratio hips/waist, unless I use a corset.
For a comparison with "everyday" doublets (not arming garments):
Piero della Francesca
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/394755_291381707579846_100001240568133_874381_1529339899_n.jpg
Fra Carnevale???
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/394104_291381870913163_100001240568133_874384_1051608427_n.jpg
Fra Carnevale
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/384952_291381957579821_100001240568133_874385_1893270192_n.jpg
Mantegna
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/407375_291382834246400_100001240568133_874392_2129061440_n.jpg
Pala di S. Ginesio
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alberto82/518215...32758@N02/
Biagio di Antonio Tucci
http://www.flickr.com/photos/repetti/23912778...32758@N02/
Oratorio dei Buonomini di S. Martino (Florence)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrea_carloni/6...32758@N02/
Arming doublet? Damn, it's hidden by the breastplate and the mail...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrea_carloni/6...8774649193
At least in those who look like the less "idealized" portraits, you can see that the ratio hips/waist is not so exagerated (if you can find them, please check also drawings by Pollaiolo and pupills)
Even if these are not arming doublets, I think it's worth to take a look, just to make a comparison with some modern reconstruction by someone who cooperates with museums (can't remember if Paola Fabbri was already cited before)
http://www.paolafabbri.it/prodotti-xv-xvi.asp?form_chiave=14
|
|
|
 |
|
Aleksei Sosnovski
|
Posted: Fri 25 May, 2012 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alessio, your doublet has some wrinkles/folds at the waist which clearly indicates that there is some free space between it and your body. There should be none. Take a belt or rope and tightly wrap it around your waist. This is how a doublet should be. If it is loose and you attach your leg harness to it the harness will hang on your shoulders tiring you quickly and impairing your freedom of movement. If the doublet is made correctly leg harness should hang on your waist rather than shoulders. This way you can wear leg armor for the whole day without your shoulders and back getting tired.
|
|
|
 |
|
Alessio J. Orlandi
Usergroups: None
Location: Bologna, Italy Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat 26 May, 2012 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The waist is actually wrong because there are no lower faulds. There should be a seam around the waist, but I made the doublet in just 4 pieces instead of 8 (now i'm making one in 8 pieces). At the moment I'm using a belt to sustain the harnesses, but I'm thinking of some modifications so that i can attach them to the doublet together with the hoses (I think I'll need a second raw of eyelets).
|
|
|
 |
|
Lee Burge
|
Posted: Sat 08 Sep, 2012 1:36 pm Post subject: Specifically Italian arming doublets...? |
|
|
Hello All,
I noted that most, if not all of the images of specifically Italian arming doublets come from the first half of the 15th century. Are there any images of Italian arming doublets from the third quarter of the 15th century. Does their construction mimic that of earlier styles or did they become shorter and tighter (especially on the upper arms) as did doublets of more northerly areas of Europe? Thank you, and I look forward to reading any and all replies.
Vale,
Lee Burge
8, Sept 2012
|
|
|
 |
|
Lee Burge
|
Posted: Sat 08 Sep, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: Specifically Italian Arming Doublets (again)... |
|
|
| P.S. I've also noted that Italian doublets seem to have more puffy or baggy upper sleeves, even when the garments are intended for wear under armour, and to support the same. A doublet needs to be snug to the body of the wearer so that the armour worn on top of and attached to it will also fit snugly and be without gaps and not restrict movement while in battle. The idea of wearing arm harness attched to a baggy or loose upper sleeve seems counter to this idea. Could it be that the upper sleeves, as seen on so many Italian arming doublets, are in fact padded and not simply baggy and loose. The lower sleeves certainly seem padded, as there are often visible stitching lines that seem to be holding multiple layers in place on lower sleeves, but could the upper sleeves be so padded as well, perhaps a bit more thickly than the lower sleeve? Thanks again!
|
|
|
 |
|
Alessio J. Orlandi
Usergroups: None
Location: Bologna, Italy Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue 02 Oct, 2012 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, everydays doublets (at least in Italy) often display ornamental stitching on the lower arms and faulds. That is probabaly also to give more rigidity to that part of the garment which is not usually padded.
Upper sleeves of italian (civil) doublets are baggy but probably not padded.
My arming doublet (see above) has baggy sleeves but they're not uncomfortable under the armour. Anyway, it seems strange that in Italy there is no trace of specific arming doublets.
|
|
|
 |
|
Mark Griffin
|
Posted: Fri 03 May, 2013 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
anyone have any better pics of this Pisanello fresco in the ducal palace in Mantova?
Attachment: 43.15 KB, Viewed: 258 times

|
|
|
 |
|
Kel Rekuta
|
Posted: Fri 03 May, 2013 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
This page is pretty good for Pisanello's various works: http://www.thais.it/speciali/PISANELLO/Pisanello.htm
Most of the image banks have very reasonable prices for educational use of hi-res digital images. I think I paid $35-40 each for a series of fresco images from the Trinci Palazzo. I have a lot of art books with poorer images that I paid WAAAY more for. The detail in hi-res images is well worth the cost.
|
|
|
 |
|
|