Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

Some flattened Roman mail. I have to link you to the big picture so you can see. http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/img...ata09b.jpg Look closely, especially down the right side, you can see the riveted rings have been flattened. The punched rings look like they vary from a compressed oval to flat.
From http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/loricae_hamata.htm
Not sure how they can tell this is Roman.
Len Parker wrote:
Some flattened Roman mail. I have to link you to the big picture so you can see. http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/img...ata09b.jpg Look closely, especially down the right side, you can see the riveted rings have been flattened. The punched rings look like they vary from a compressed oval to flat.
From http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/loricae_hamata.htm
Not sure how they can tell this is Roman.


I don't think they're certain that it is.

The link identifies it as being in the Zagreb Archaeological Museum, Musei Archaeologici Zagrabiensis. A quick search brought a bilingual monograph of the catalog which has images of both samples.
https://www.academia.edu/513681/Militaria_Sisciensia_Musei_Archaeologici_Zagrabiensis_Catalogi_et_Monographiae_vol._1_Zagreb_2005

p.79
Quote:
Cat. Nos.133 and 134 represent two larger fragments of a mail
armour, found during the dredging of the Kupa river near Sisak. On
those photographs can be seen the method of construction of mail
armour. Considering that the mail armour did not change
its shape through the centuries, it is impossible to determine their
closer dating. (Fig. 18-19)



 Attachment: 150.73 KB
Page 78, Cat. No. 134 [ Download ]
Len Parker wrote:
Some flattened Roman mail. I have to link you to the big picture so you can see. http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/img...ata09b.jpg Look closely, especially down the right side, you can see the riveted rings have been flattened. The punched rings look like they vary from a compressed oval to flat.
From http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/loricae_hamata.htm
Not sure how they can tell this is Roman.


Very strange looking, double solid links, has this been seen on other examples?

[ Linked Image ]
Not doubled, it's just not woven into the fabric yet.

Between the low-resolution pictures, the lack of measurements, and the corrosion from being a river find, I see no reason to think it's Roman rather than something associated with the late 16th century battle of Sisak vs. the Turks. I'm sure the area has a lot of history in between which might account for it too.
A few of my own pictures of supposedly roman mail from archeological museum in Zagreb:





Two mail armours from Graz Zeughaus. The problem is that I don't really know which pictures belong to which armour. :) One was the shirt with dense collar you see complete in one picture and the other was shown in combination with hussar breastplate, so only sleeves could be seen well.















I think this is the other one because the rivet caps are round:







You take take good photos, Luka. The shirt with collar in the Graz is being displayed inside-out. At least we can see the inside of the wedge-riveted joint that way. :D
Is mail better when its small or large rings?
Small and relatively thick is the best. Especially against thrusts and arrows.
Mart Shearer wrote:
You take take good photos, Luka. The shirt with collar in the Graz is being displayed inside-out. At least we can see the inside of the wedge-riveted joint that way. :D


Thanks! I didn't realize it's inside out. :)
Royal Armory in Leeds, maille pictures (1 of 4)
Visited the Royal Armoury in Leeds recently, some maille pictures:

[Overall, the collection on display isn't really worth visiting the Armoury for. But since entrance is free, it may be nice to visit if you happen to be in Leeds anyhow]


(maille on aventail of helmet shown)




J.B.


Last edited by Jasper B. on Wed 19 Aug, 2015 12:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Royal Armory in Leeds, maille pictures (2 of 4)
Ok, not really maille, but interesting enough.





J.B.
Royal Armory in Leeds, maille pictures (3 of 4)
Larger than real example of Japanese weave.




J.B.
Royal Armory in Leeds, maille pictures (4 of 4)
Most interesting maille on display (in my opinion)

It is somewhat hard to get decent pictures through the glass of the display cases, but I hope they are helpful to someone.














J.B.
Mail shirt 19325, grid Vxx6 from Wisby:
http://catview.historiska.se/catview/media/highres/374312

OK, It's not in great shape, but consider the iron was buried with a few hundred decaying corpses.
Mart Shearer wrote:
You take take good photos, Luka. The shirt with collar in the Graz is being displayed inside-out. At least we can see the inside of the wedge-riveted joint that way. :D


This hauberk looks like it was never worn, the back of the links show no wear/burnishing, you can really see how the rivets fit into the slot punched for them.

[ Linked Image ]
Eric S wrote:
Mart Shearer wrote:
MET 36.25.476.
http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/27751

Mail Shirt
Date: 17th–19th century
Culture: Tibetan, possibly Bhutanese or Nepalese
Medium: Iron, leather, textile
Dimensions: Weight, 18 lb. 14 oz. (8561.6 g)
Classification: Mail
Credit Line: Bequest of George C. Stone, 1935
Accession Number: 36.25.476

Not a good enough set of photos to see any real details of the riveting.

There is one privately owned example of a similar Tibetan armor that I know of, I have asked the owner for some detailed pictures of the mail or at least a description as to if it is all riveted or demi riveted.


[ Linked Image ]

Met Tibetan armor.
[ Linked Image ]


I finally have some detailed images from a Tibetan riveted mail hauberk showing the outside and inside on the links. There are no solid links, the mail appears to be round riveted and quite old with some areas being worn to the point were both the inside and outside are worn smooth and you can not see any details of the links. There are a lot of butted repairs.

This mail does not look to be just a copy of Indo-Persian mail, it look to have been made independently, supposedly these Tibetan hauberks were worn by mounted warriors which may explain why some lower areas would be heavily worn down while other areas are not worn down as much.

Tibetan riveted mail, exterior of the links on the left, interior of the links on the right.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/2f/f8/c4/2ff8c448db6fd96b505ad8ac1ba3f8ed.jpg
[ Linked Image ]
I wouldn't be surprised if the "Tibetan" mail is actually a European import.

Another fragment from Wisby:
http://catview.historiska.se/catview/media/highres/321781
http://mis.historiska.se/mis/sok/bild.asp?uid=321781
Mart Shearer wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if the "Tibetan" mail is actually a European import.



Mart, what is your reasoning.?

On that same note, here is another interesting example. 17th century Ottoman kolluk/bazu band (vambrace/arm guards). If you look at the detailed view of the riveted mail it is not alternating solid and riveted links as almost all Indo-Persian mail is, and the links look like they have watershed, the failed link rivet hole does not look round.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/96/5a/6d/965a6d14eff75223290417ec9aeb8e83.jpg
[ Linked Image ]
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/c5/b0/6d/c5b06df8c0fb706f5d7d80c1b52adc1d.png
[ Linked Image ]
Few months ago I was visiting in Krakow again. There is great exhibition called Ottomania in the Museum Narodowe. After the exhibition I went to the basic exhibition and took few pictures of the mailshirts they have. One is the type known having islamic inscriptions around all the rings. This shirt is under one Hussar armour so you have to be on a sharp mood to notice. The next one is behind the glass and what it looks there is a small crosses decorated on each ring.
r. Peter


 Attachment: 347 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 462.18 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 348.62 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 476.6 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 358.44 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 465.86 KB
[ Download ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

Page 23 of 27

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum