Go to page Previous  1, 2

Re: Collectors
Craig Johnson wrote:
Hey Russ

The reason is as simple as he had it in his possession for a long while and eventually decided to pass it on and acquire new pieces. The collector that needs to control expenditure almost always use this methodology to adjust their collections over the years. Ewart always was aware that he was only a temporary guardian for these pieces that they would continue on and that to try to hold on to something forever was futile. Much better to care, nurture and learn then make sure they continue on to a good home.

The first time I met Ewart and Sybil he had an afternoon of tea and whiskey and great discussions. I spent the majority of the day with the sword laying in my lap and it really was one of the first pieces I was able to handle and admire in great detail and time. Pretty good day all and all
:)

Best
Craig


What a neat story Craig. Can you describe the conditon of the sword as you saw it at that time?
I think that there was a huge arguement about the provenance of that sword as well. If I recall correctly it had passed through the hands of an expert faker/forger and was therefore suspect. It was sold away before the real provenance was proven.[/quote]

Yeah, that was my guess too (that and Roger's point that Canterbury was unconvinced of Edward's ownership of the sword). By the way, the "expert faker/forger" you speak of -- would that be a man named Louis Marcy?
Edward Hitchens wrote:
I think that there was a huge arguement about the provenance of that sword as well. If I recall correctly it had passed through the hands of an expert faker/forger and was therefore suspect. It was sold away before the real provenance was proven.


Yeah, that was my guess too (that and Roger's point that Canterbury was unconvinced of Edward's ownership of the sword). By the way, the "expert faker/forger" you speak of -- would that be a man named Louis Marcy?[/quote]

Precisely. Apparently after some of his stuff was confirmed to be forgeries the "experts" of the day dismissed almost everything he had outright including the Edward III sword and a matching dagger that went with it. It was only after further study that others were pretty much able to definitively prove that the sword was authentic. Unfortunately by that time it had already been sold to a foreign collector.
Go to page Previous  1, 2

Page 2 of 2

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum