Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Historic Sword Construction/ Peening Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Michael F.




Location: Vermont
Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 106

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 3:34 pm    Post subject: Historic Sword Construction/ Peening         Reply with quote

Lately I've been thinking about how historical swords were constructed. In particular how they were peened. I've wondered, did smiths use the cold peening process, (possibly before grip was added to relieve stress?). Or hot peening process, which seems to be stronger. Medieval smiths did not have high powered blow torches (such as the ones used by Albion) to hot peen their swords. I've learned alot about grip construction via this site, but not alot about this subject. Also I am also quite curious as to how rivet blocks were put in place.

I've read that cold peening with the compression method is not accurate. Swords that have grips which are bored or burned through are, from what i have learned, historically accurate. This method makes it necessary to use a compression method because the grip needs to be put in place before the pommel. Plus, that sword could not be hot peened because the heat used would surely burn the grip, right? because they did not have blow/ welding torches to hot peen, if they did hot peen, what did they use? If I am totally off please tell me! Feel free to share knowledge and opinions.

Thanks!
Michael F.

"Tis but a scratch.....A scratch? your arm's off!"-- Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
View user's profile Send private message
Shane Smith




Location: Virginia Beach
Joined: 24 Aug 2003
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 49

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 3:50 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Just a note.Threaded pommels were used in period on occasion. The source text "Gladiatoria" bears this assertion out.
Shane Smith
ARMA~ Virginia Beach
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 4:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Historic Sword Construction/ Peening         Reply with quote

Michael,
Swords were certainly made with the compression method historically. Cold peening was also used. According to some smiths, some swords had tangs that were dead soft, non-heat-treated or more like iron than steel. A soft tang can be peened cold without cracking. I'd have to disagree with anyone who says that cold peening with the compression method is not accurate. It may not be ideal in some cases today, given the materials and methods used in some modern repros, but it is historic for certain periods and sword types.

Wedged components are historically accurate, as were components held together my pressure or compression. You could have a combination of things, too, which further muddies things up. The guard could be wedged, peened, or even shimmed into place. The grip could have been slipped on, then the pommel hammered down onto a slightly-oversized tang for a tight fit. A slip-on grip doesn't always equate to compression being the primary method of holding things firm.

A rivet block would slip over the part of the tang that sticks out of the end of the pommel. It would usually be held in place through compression. Its purpose is both decorative and functional. If you need to dismount the sword, just file off the peened part. When remounting the sword, replace the rivet block with one slightly shorter. Otherwise you'd have to shorten the grip or something to get enough tang to re-peen.

It's hard to talk in absolutes on these things sometimes. Plenty of swords survive without their grips whose pommels and guards are not loose. You can also find many surviving examples that are loose, too. That, to me, shows that both methods were used.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 6:42 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

You can't make broad sweeping generalized statements about what is and is not historically accurate. Everything depends on the time of the piece, the place it was made/used, the type of weapon it is, and perhaps even the ability or preference of the maker. Generalized statements simply do not work in this case.
.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Michael F.




Location: Vermont
Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 106

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nathan Robinson wrote:
You can't make broad sweeping generalized statements about what is and is not historically accurate. Everything depends on the time of the piece, the place it was made/used, the type of weapon it is, and perhaps even the ability or preference of the maker. Generalized statements simply do not work in this case.


Actually, I was trying to avoid generalizations. I was just sharing what I have read/ heard- which says a certain method is accurate or not accurate. I actually have little knowledge so far as to what is and isn't historically accurate. I should have specified what I am looking for- basically, western european single handed and longswords from the early middle-ages to the Renaissance. I'm also looking for how and why methods changed through out the time. Sorry, I should have been more specific- hope this clears things up.

"Tis but a scratch.....A scratch? your arm's off!"-- Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 8:50 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Michael F. wrote:
Actually, I was trying to avoid generalizations. I was just sharing what I have read/ heard- which says a certain method is accurate or not accurate. I actually have little knowledge so far as to what is and isn't historically accurate. I should have specified what I am looking for- basically, western european single handed and longswords from the early middle-ages to the Renaissance. I'm also looking for how and why methods changed through out the time. Sorry, I should have been more specific- hope this clears things up.

Your question was very clear.. that was my answer. Happy Unfortunately, my answer isn't very helpful. Cool

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
G. Scott H.




Location: Arizona, USA
Joined: 22 Feb 2005

Posts: 410

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 10:30 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nathan Robinson wrote:
You can't make broad sweeping generalized statements about what is and is not historically accurate. Everything depends on the time of the piece, the place it was made/used, the type of weapon it is, and perhaps even the ability or preference of the maker. Generalized statements simply do not work in this case.
Fair enough, but are you disputing whether or not cold peening and/or compression fitting of hilt components were used historically, or are you just saying that different methods were used at different times and places? Question Happy
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Thu 30 Jun, 2005 11:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

G. Scott H. wrote:
Nathan Robinson wrote:
You can't make broad sweeping generalized statements about what is and is not historically accurate. Everything depends on the time of the piece, the place it was made/used, the type of weapon it is, and perhaps even the ability or preference of the maker. Generalized statements simply do not work in this case.
Fair enough, but are you disputing whether or not cold peening and/or compression fitting of hilt components were used historically, or are you just saying that different methods were used at different times and places? Question Happy


Yes. They're all accurate.

the particulars all depends on the time of the piece, the place it was made and used, the type of weapon it is, and perhaps even the ability of the maker.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Risto Rautiainen




Location: Kontiolahti, Finland
Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Reading list: 10 books

Posts: 176

PostPosted: Fri 01 Jul, 2005 12:18 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Regarding the question about hot peening... Although the medieval smith didn't have welding torches, I believe it could be done. A few years ago in a discussion with a blacksmith I found out that the smith I talked to had been an apprentice to a smith who had such a forge that he could direct the heat very acutely producing fire that was almost blowtorch like. It could be done by building a potlike fire in the forge sand and making the opening hole for the "pot" quite small. IIRC they used this technique to forgeweld broken bicycle frames back together.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Historic Sword Construction/ Peening
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum