Go to page Previous  1, 2

Alan Williams wrote:
Many thanks to Hugh and everybody for their help and information.
This certainly helps with some great links and period images.
I’m particularly interested in this type of harness http://www.lightlink.com/armory/bob.html as it’s very similar to a museum replica displayed in the Agincourt museum.
http://www.azincourt-medieval.com/


Alan,

For the harnesses of that period I strongly reccomend only the very high-end armorers, then you'll need to get an arming doublet and mail voiders from Historic Enterprises:
http://www.historicenterprises.com/cart.php?m...&c=120
http://www.historicenterprises.com/cart.php?m...t&c=25

I'll attach an effigy of one of my favorite harnesses of that period to this e-mail.


 Attachment: 103.58 KB
John Peryent, esquire to Henry V, ob. 1415 [ Download ]
Speaking of 14th century armour, would this arm harness by GDFB be appropriate for a late 14th century harness?
Kind of off topic, but I just noticed this(http://www.themcs.org/armour/knights/2006%20M...1%2006.jpg) effigy of a knight who died in 1360 from that excellent link posted earlier. Does anyone here have an idea as to whether the striking black and gold colours of this man's armour would have been achieved by paint or by oxide-blackening and latten-gilding etc... Does anyone know of any evidence one way or the other?
Hugh Knight wrote:


Alan,

For the harnesses of that period I strongly reccomend only the very high-end armorers, then you'll need to get an arming doublet and mail voiders...


I've not come across any evidence for voiders this early on in the late 14th and early 15th century. Could you provide some examples as to why voiders would be used, rather than a full shirt (which seemed common until the mid-15th century, as far as I can tell).

-Gregory-
Gregory,

Now you have made an interesting comment.... It seems by both effigies and some other artwork that the mail shirts get smaller between 1350 and 1450. If you look at effigies of knights that lived anywhere between 1400-1450 it seems they do indeed get higher up the thigh and that most appear to have shorter sleeves. Part of the issue are the odd accounts that pop up indicating mail shirts to the knees still. I believe it is Warin who makes this statement of agincourt, yet if you look at the effigies around the time of and after agincourt few wear knee length hauberks. I have noted in inventories the hauberk or mail suit is not usually listed as to what its length is BUT often seems a mail skirt appears. This could just be extra mail for lighter fighting or for retainers though but it could also be to replace wearing a full shirt. At least into the 1st half of the 15th you can still find inventories of knights with basically full suits of armour with mail suits and a padded garment. Now the size might have changed greatly for the mail but there are moving toward less mail, just do not know when the jump is made.


AS far as only the high end armourers... Well depends on what you are going for. I'd stay away from having a well heat treated armour for most of the 14th and early 15th unless I represent someone with financial greatness. Now on the other hand the sacrifice for accuracy is worth the real costs if you plan on getting a hard beating often perhaps and the suit is the one and only you will buy for some duration of time. That said I'd simplify many of the harness bits of late 14th as most that remain are those of counts, dukes, kings, etc. On the other hand if you go with a high end armourer you will know that no matter what processes used and materials it will fit together and look right. It is your armour. I'd look through tons of effigies, narrow a time period down and settle. Once you get a few decades chosen then you may be able to start deciding on what you want to use for your harness.

RPM
Gregory J. Liebau wrote:
I've not come across any evidence for voiders this early on in the late 14th and early 15th century. Could you provide some examples as to why voiders would be used, rather than a full shirt (which seemed common until the mid-15th century, as far as I can tell).


Frankly, the evidence either way is almost nil. We know that voiders were in use by the mid-15th century, but have no hard evidence as to how early they started being used.

But think about it: Why wear a full haubergeon under a complete armor (by which I mean a breast and back with a fauld and culet)? It doesn't get you anything since virtually nothing could penetrate the plate in the first place. And since full armor was being worn as early as the last decade of the 14th century (and probably earlier, maybe as far back as 1375, but I can prove it by the end of the century) and since these guys weren't stupid, it doesn't seem like a big leap.

I have been researching this as I'm having a Churburg #18 harness (c. 1415) made right now. I spoke with Robert MacPherson about this subject and he felt strongly that voiders were not unreasonable even as early as the late 14th C. We discussed their development and he pointed out an interesting Italian picture which shows a man at arms, already wearing a mail fauld (and yes, I know some Italian knights wore two layers of mail, but bear with me) who is pulling on what appears to be an abbreviated mail shirt. It seems as though it would cover the body just down below the arm openings on the breastplate.

Is this proof? Of course not, the picture isn't even that clear. But as I said, these guys weren't stupid, and voiders aren't a tough reach to condisre when you're wearing a full armor.


 Attachment: 26.68 KB
Italian Shrug.jpg

Go to page Previous  1, 2

Page 2 of 2

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum