Posts: 1,084 Location: Finland
Tue 16 Nov, 2004 3:48 am
Hi there, yet another newcomer here...
For historical swords comparable to those in Conan the Barbarian and such films, one could do worse than look at Viking swords. A couple of examples:
[ Linked Image ]
From the viking burial site of Kilmainham
[ Linked Image ]
One of my all-time favorites, this beauty... from Lund, IIRC (note the locket stuck to the crossguard)
All in all, I think the main difference between the decoration on historical and fantasy swords is that, in historical examples it very rarely interferes with the sword's function, while in many fantasy designs the decorative elements would seem at the least distracting, and at worst downright dangerous, to the user - for example, the ever-popular horns/talons/fangs curving from the cross *towards the grip*, making it impossible to hold without having them dig into you hand, wrist, or arm; or the frequently impractical decoration on the grip itself, making it uncomfortable in the extreme to actually grip. Also, the fantasy decorative motifs and themes are usually quite easy to distinguish from historical ones - there's a certain, almost invariable, Hammer Gothic or Art Nouveau air to the modern fantasy variety.
Not that this necessarily makes the fantasy pieces unattractive, of course (I love Art Nouveau and Hammer horror films, too :)), but it does make them stand out from historical specimens. Which might be either good or bad, depending on your tastes and needs.