Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Deciding on My Next Two Albion Swords... Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page 1, 2  Next 
Author Message
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 1:46 am    Post subject: Deciding on My Next Two Albion Swords...         Reply with quote

And I could use your input, particularly if you own one of the swords in consideration.
First, I'm about to put in for my "Free 7th" sword and I have narrowed (well, sorta narrowed!) the field to the following:
Jarl $980
Berserker $820
Vassal $980
Tritonia (Museum Line) $1000
Duke $750
Sempach $750
Landgraf $750
Munich $900
Gallowglass $850
Several of these swords aren't in production yet, so obviously there can be no objective input on those, but the rest I'd like to hear from owners about. On basis of cost I'm probably leaning toward the Sempach, Landgraf, Duke, Berserker, and Gallowglass, since I have a credit of a bit over $700. Nonetheless, cost is not the sole determining factor.

Second, I intend to buy a NG sword while they are on sale and have narrowed the choice to:
Ritter $580 on sale
Crecy $480 on sale
Thoughts from owners?

Thanks,
Brian M
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 3:18 am    Post subject: Re: Deciding on My Next Two Albion Swords...         Reply with quote

Brian-

Normally, if I found someone in a quandry like this, I'd say "lucky bugger... wish I had problems like that..." but actually, right now, I'm in almost the same boat. Not knowing what your collection consists of, your general concept driving your collection, it's a little hard to give much constructive help. If you could give me a rundown of what you have and where you want your colleciton to go, I might be able to give more directed advice.

For now, here's what I can say - my own opinions, based on where my collection is going...

To put this in context, my collection primarily consists of Albion Next Gen and Museum Line pieces, and is mostly medieval, with a couple of Viking/AS pieces. I don't personally have any interest in the Roman pieces at this point... not likely to. I have the Brescia, Regent, Landgraf, Squire, Knight, Ritter, Hersir, Vinland, with the Svante and Munich on order. More pieces will be added, though my pace of 1/month may have to slow down here for a bit while I handle some other business - and the Svante is significantly more than my 1-month budget.

The Jarl is arguably the sweetest of the whole Viking/AS line. This is going to be an eventual addition - if I didn't have the Hersir, I'd be really tempted by this.

Berserkr - I just don't know. As intriguing as this piece is, I'm going to have to wait to see it. This isn't screaming "buy me" to me - at least, not as loud as some of the other pieces on your list.

Vassal - Pretty much the same sentiment as I have about the Berserkr... not a massive Falchion fan.

Tritonia - A piece I will likely eventually pick up, but it isn't high on my list. If I spend more time with it in hand, it may grow on me, but when I put it in hand, I wasn't blown away. I didn't hate it, we just seemed to be a bit reluctant to bond.

Duke - I can't say... Played briefly with a Baron before, and it was really a shocker - think this may well be similar. Again, though, there are other pieces on the list that I would be more excited about (some I already do have...)

Sempach/Landgraf - Close enough to the same piece. I like my Landgraf. It's more a matter of aesthetics for me between these two... Handles well, cuts well, and if you do a search for "Mortschlag" on here, you'll find a thread that I discuss how nasty this piece is from every angle... including the pommel and cross.

Munich - Literally within minutes of Howy announcing this piece, I had the first one off the line reserved. "SOLD!... how much was it again?" Worried I don't know if I'd put the credit towards it, though... It won't be out for a few months at least. I want what I want when I want it. With the long list of other pieces you have, I'd put it elsewhere, and save over time to pick this one up.

Gallowglass - I'm somewhat interested in this concept, but am personally more interested in a piece like the Markgraf or Hauptman for a XIX. This is strictly personal... I had thought about the Kern/Gallowglass combination, but really like the Condottiere/Markgraf combo better.

Ok, so out of this list, which would I choose to toss that credit at? Sempach/Landgraf or Duke.



On to round two... Ritter vs. Crecy.

I own the Ritter, got to play with the Crecy in Atlanta. Both are nice pieces. I have not cut with the Crecy, nor have I spent the time handling it that I have the Ritter.

The Ritter flat out kicks ass. Definitely check out Patrick's review, if you haven't already. It's just such a shocking piece in hand - not at all what I expected. In Atlanta, I was handling sword after sword. I handed one back to Harlan, and he handed me another. I wasn't really paying attention when he handed this to me. I didn't see my face, of course, but I did see Harlan's reaction to my expression. It was one of those "huh? wait... holy crap! This is sweet... what the...? The RITTER?!? NO WAY!". Harlan just grinned. I brought it home.

Now, the Crecy is no slouch either. I'm considering one of these in the more proximal future. Handled quite well, nice aesthetics.

It depends on what you want in your collection and your reasons for singling these two out. I personally hated the Ritter until that fateful moment. I love all of my Albions, but the Ritter has seen a good bit of cutting and handling from both me and my room mate. He cuts almost exclusively with it, actually. Conversely, I wasn't stunned by the Crecy. Thought it was a nice piece, but nothing "OH MY GOD" amazing. Possibly because I had fairly high expectations of it, and it met them, whereas I really sold the Ritter short, and it proved me completely wrong. The Ritter also fit a strong need - a piece from the Crusades...

Bottom line on these two, I think both are nice pieces, and both would be good additions to any collection they would fit in. If I get a chance to handle the Crecy again soon, I'll let you know what I think of it more objectively.



Flipping this around on you...

I have a bit over $725 credit. Here's my rundown of choices...

Svante. $2500 The Svante is already on a payment plan... probably 2-3 months out whether I use the credit or not.
Solingen. $1000 Thanks to Harlan and the fact that this piece kept ending up in my hand in Atlanta...
Castellan. $750 Best of the short XVa's in my opinion. I love the feel of the grip and responsiveness of the sword.

Thoughts?

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joachim Nilsson





Joined: 29 Sep 2003

Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 6:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Simply put: Munich and Ritter.
View user's profile
David Lannon




Location: East Bay California
Joined: 25 Aug 2003

Posts: 129

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 9:50 am    Post subject: Hate those decisions         Reply with quote

Brian, I own the Tritonia and I love it. It IS a beast of a sword however. I particulary like the round pommel. The blade is pretty much a cleaver. I was stunned to see the distal taper on the blade; it is quite thin out towards the tip. I think this sword would be perfect for mounted warfare where you have the momentum of a horse behind you. It is NOT a duelists weapon however.

I also own the Crecy and I personally would choose it over the Ritter. The Ritter has a beautiful blade but I never liked those "cocked hat" pommels.

The others you mentioned, I cant comment on. I do like the look of the Munich but the blade is awfully narrow and I like those big manly swords Laughing Out Loud

Take care and best of luck
Dave Lannon

Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the gun!!!!
View user's profile Send private message
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 11:43 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Good advice so far.
My collection currently consists of: Gaddhjalt, Templar, Knight, Sovreign, Baron, and the SoSM when it comes out. So as you can see my focus is right now toward the earlier cutting swords. Like Aaron, I have little interest in the Roman swords. I would like to pick at least one Viking this year between the Berserker, Jarl, and Hersir.
Regarding my "free sword list," I'm inclined to elimianate the Tritonia first off, due to cost and the fact that the RItter could arguably fill that gap for less money. Likewise the Vassal. Even though I'd like a Falchion and I think a representative collection should have one, $980 is a little steep right now. I really like both the Sempach and Landgraf -- I just can't decide which one I like more. I lean slightly toward the Sempach if only to get away from the "wheel-pommel theme." The Duke is a bit down the list for me; it's in consideration due to cost and the desire to have an example of the XIIIa. The Munich and Gallowglass are both very interesting swords. The Jarl looks like a beautiful sword and the only thing that's keeping me away from it now is cost. The Berserker I will be picking up sometime this year, but perhaps not now.
Regarding my "NG sale" list, both Ritter and Crecy would fill a need in my collection. I'm probably leaning slightly toward the Ritter. When I first saw it I didn't care much for it, but it's been growing on me. It would fit in very nicely with my Gaddhjalt, Templar, and Knight. Note, if the Agincourt comes out before Aug 20, it would also be in consideration.

Aaron,
Regarding your Free Sword choice:
Svante: You're already paying it off, so either the credit pays down the Svante and you use the money that would've gone to pay down the Svante to buy another sword on your list, or vice-versa. That said, I would use the credit to pay down the Svante and use the money saved to take advantage of the NG sale. Why? Because the credit does NOT apply to the sale price, only to the full price of the "Free Sword." Plus, any credit amount you have over and above the full price of the "Free Sword" just goes away. I just asked Mike about that. So probably it's best applied to a sword that isn't likely to go on sale. Of course, this decision is also influence by whether or not there is a NG sword you'd like to pick up on sale...
Solingen: I can't say I've handled this (or any other) Museum line sword, but honestly it's my least favorite Museum Line piece. It's nice-looking, but it just doesn't do anything for me. Personally I'd consider the SoSM-Turin first and the Tritonia a rather distant second. Of course, I may be biased since I have a Turin on order.
Castellan: There are also some other XVas due out in the near future. I've got my eye on the Agincourt, but then these new XVas seem to have longer, slimmer blades than the first batch, which might be a factor for you.

Anyways, my thought is to use your credit to pay down Svante, and use the money saved to pick up a NG on your wish-list while they are on sale.

Brian M
View user's profile Send private message
Steve Maly




Location: OKC, OK
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Reading list: 23 books

Posts: 257

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 12:42 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I can only speak towards the swords that I have in my collection, and from your list, the only sword I currently own is the Jarl. Compared to my ArmArt viking sword (similar in form to the Huskarl), the Jarl is much more lively in the hand and is wonderfully balanced. The handling characteristics are nearly identical to my Sovereign, with a bit more power in the cut for the Jarl. It is beautifully executed, and is arguably not only the best viking sword that Albion offers (as noted by Aaron), but perhaps the best NG sword they offer. The pommel and hilt are very impressive in person. It certainly doesn't fade into the background next to my Regent and Sovereign. But then again, I'm pretty biased! Wink
"When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." ~A. Maslow
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 12:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Steve Maly wrote:
It (the Jarl) is beautifully executed, and is arguably not only the best viking sword that Albion offers (as noted by Aaron), but perhaps the best NG sword they offer. The pommel and hilt are very impressive in person. It certainly doesn't fade into the background next to my Regent and Sovereign.


I'm not surprised by this. I'm dying to actually see one in person - bet I'll have to have one when I do, too. That hilt, with it's 2-part 5-lobe pommel and silver wire... nice. It'd hold it's own in my collection, too... not a doubt in my mind. I bet it would snuggle right in there with the Brescia and Regent (even with it's true red grip!) and still stand right out.

Albion simply doesn't make a BAD sword... not really even an OK sword. In looking at the catalog or website, against all of the others, that Jarl does catch my eye every time.

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Robert B. Allison




Location: NW Montana
Joined: 21 Apr 2005

Posts: 50

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 1:24 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Terrible problem to have. I just spoke with Mike today and ordered the Jarl and the Regent, so not an inexpensive telephone conversation for me, but I'm excited about both of them and had been agonizing over which one to order and finally decided, especially in light of the ongoing sale, that the only sensible solution was to order both! I specified custom colored grip leather on both as well, dark blue on the Jarl and dark green on the Regent. These two swords put me at six, so I'm now also eligible for a "free" 7th and have not decided on which one, am taking some time to think it over and maybe to see what new offerings are coming out in the next couple of months. I'd love to have the Svante, but even with a bit over $700 knocked off the price, it's still a bit rich for my blood. I'd like to see the Messers, am not sure whether they move me or not, but perhaps they will when I see actual pics of the real deal.

I own and very much like the Landgraf. But for some reason my favorite, and one that doesn't seem to be the fave of many, is the Baron. To me that's what a Medieval sword ought to look like.
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 1:31 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Brian M wrote:
My collection currently consists of: Gaddhjalt, Templar, Knight, Sovreign, Baron, and the SoSM when it comes out. So as you can see my focus is right now toward the earlier cutting swords.


Dang, man... you like to hack and slash, don't you? Big Grin Sorry, wasn't hacking your collection or trying to cut you down to size, had to poke fun at you... oh, wait... that's the main thrust of my collection. Razz

Ok, all kidding aside, here... Looks like a nice collection. Ok, so now I have a little better timeframe and focus of your collection. Thank you.

Brian wrote:
I would like to pick at least one Viking this year between the Berserker, Jarl, and Hersir.


Ugh... that's a TOUGH decision, especially based solely on some pics. The Hersir is coming soon (like less than a week from now - ships Monday!) and I'll be glad to give you my impressions. There is a review on it, and on the Jarl on here. The Berserkr is coming soon, and I really want to check it out. Eventually, I'd like to own all 3, but the Hersir will fill the need for now quite nobly. If it weren't for other slots in the Typology I want to fill, I'd probably hit the Viking/AS pieces pretty hard. The Thegn may well be my next one from this set.

Brian wrote:
Regarding my "free sword list," I'm inclined to elimianate the Tritonia first off, due to cost and the fact that the RItter could arguably fill that gap for less money.


They are different, but both would be horrifying from horseback. I personally agree with you here that the general niche would be adequately filled by one or the other. I will probably eventually get the Tritonia as well - it's just so unique with the pommel and all. Also, I just like the whole concept of the Museum Line.

Brian wrote:
I really like both the Sempach and Landgraf -- I just can't decide which one I like more. I lean slightly toward the Sempach if only to get away from the "wheel-pommel theme."


Not to make the decision tough again - that Landgraf pommel stands out against a few others - it's more of an oval, with the engraving. I personally like the pierced cross - I think it makes it stand out as much as the Sempach's pommel would. But hey... I'm honestly 50/50 on this one. They both are really decent pieces. Oh, and the Landgraf just seems a little better fit with the Gallowglass or Kern... at least aesthetically. On the other hand, diversity is a good thing... Razz

Brian wrote:
The Duke is a bit down the list for me; it's in consideration due to cost and the desire to have an example of the XIIIa.


The Duke and Baron are both on my list... I want both eventually, but if I had one, I could live without the other for a while. That's me, though... Given the spot you are in, with the collection you have, if you want to stay with the general early cutters, I might go this way. If you want to diversify, I wouldn't - I'd go with the Sempach or Landgraf.

Brian wrote:
Regarding my "NG sale" list, both Ritter and Crecy would fill a need in my collection. I'm probably leaning slightly toward the Ritter. When I first saw it I didn't care much for it, but it's been growing on me. It would fit in very nicely with my Gaddhjalt, Templar, and Knight. Note, if the Agincourt comes out before Aug 20, it would also be in consideration.


Same thought as above... if you want to stick with this general focus, yeah, the Ritter would be a wonderful addition - these pieces would fit nicely together. If you want to diversify, you could look toward either the Crecy or possibly the Agincourt - IF it comes out by then.

Brian wrote:
Regarding your Free Sword choice:
Svante: You're already paying it off, so either the credit pays down the Svante and you use the money that would've gone to pay down the Svante to buy another sword on your list, or vice-versa. That said, I would use the credit to pay down the Svante and use the money saved to take advantage of the NG sale. Why? Because the credit does NOT apply to the sale price, only to the full price of the "Free Sword."


True, but then the Svante doesn't count as a purchase - it was free, even though I put another $1800 with it. As I intend on another "7th" within a year, that alone is $300 in credit. Eek!

Brian wrote:
Plus, any credit amount you have over and above the full price of the "Free Sword" just goes away. I just asked Mike about that. So probably it's best applied to a sword that isn't likely to go on sale. Of course, this decision is also influence by whether or not there is a NG sword you'd like to pick up on sale...


Yup. That's the way it works. There are about 20 - 25 pieces on my "I want one" list. Most aren't out yet. The only other one that I really do want to pick up at some point that's out (medieval next gen, anyway) is a Sovereign. I really want the Castellan more, though... I fell for this baby pretty hard in Atlanta. The cash isn't here now, anyway, and I might not have any by the time the sale ends. That said, I'd be paying $750 for it, or $725 towards for the Svante... this way may well save me that enough to cover shipping!

Brian wrote:
Solingen: I can't say I've handled this (or any other) Museum line sword, but honestly it's my least favorite Museum Line piece. It's nice-looking, but it just doesn't do anything for me. Personally I'd consider the SoSM-Turin first and the Tritonia a rather distant second. Of course, I may be biased since I have a Turin on order.


There's a reason you ordered the SoSM - just like I had to have the Brescia and Svante. They suit our different tastes quite nicely. I'm a bit backwards - out of the Museum Line, I'll have to order them thus: Svante, Bayriches, Brescia, Solingen, SoSM, Tritonia. Different focus, though... and that's cool.

Oh, and as far as handling goes, they are as nice as the Next Gens... with the exception of the Svante, if I wasn't aware there was a distinction, I couldn't pick them out of a lineup based on handling. The Svante is unlike anything else... unreal. That isn't to say they aren't worth the extra bit of expense - they are - but only because of the true emmulation of an exact piece. It's not that the Museum Line pieces aren't outstanding, it's that the Next Gens are!

Brian wrote:
Castellan: There are also some other XVas due out in the near future. I've got my eye on the Agincourt, but then these new XVas seem to have longer, slimmer blades than the first batch, which might be a factor for you.


It's a huge factor for me. I'll have one of each... maybe two of the longer XVa's. I'm thinking Castellan and Fiore, but any of those others may step up and take the Fiore's place. I'll have to see when they come out. Grips and handling are major factors for me, especially with this Typology.

I appreciate your input, Brian!

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Alexi Goranov
myArmoury Alumni


myArmoury Alumni

Location: San Francisco, CA
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Reading list: 72 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 1,191

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 1:36 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Brian M wrote:
Good advice so far.
My collection currently consists of: Gaddhjalt, Templar, Knight, Sovreign, Baron, and the SoSM when it comes out. So as you can see my focus is right now toward the earlier cutting swords. Like Aaron, I have little interest in the Roman swords. I would like to pick at least one Viking this year between the Berserker, Jarl, and Hersir.
Regarding my "free sword list," I'm inclined to elimianate the Tritonia first off, due to cost and the fact that the RItter could arguably fill that gap for less money.

Brian M


Hi brian,

since you are asking for opinions I will throw mine out there. From all Albion swords I appreciate the museum line the most. As you know, these are extremely close reproductions of extant period weapons. To me the excitement of this hobby is not only owning a ton of swords (this is the second most exiting part though) but appreciating the the existing period weapons. The next best thing to owning a well preserved antique is having an excellent reproduction made. this is what the museum line does for you. And some swords these are. I am currently torn between the Solingen and Tritonia. I actually want them both. I like the Tritonia because it is such an odd duck and is a monster in the cut. It is a very heavy sword with nearly parallel edges. This means that miracles need to be done with the distal taper to make these 3.5lb alive in your hand. This is what appeals to me.

My point is that the Ritter cannot fulfill the role of the Tritonia. These are different swords and each brings different things to the table.

Of course, you have to evaluate your particular like of the sword's aesthetics, the financial part to it, and the philosophy of your collection. With choices like that, you'd be happy no matter what Happy

Alexi
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 2:22 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Alexi Goranov wrote:

My point is that the Ritter cannot fulfill the role of the Tritonia. These are different swords and each brings different things to the table.

Of course, you have to evaluate your particular like of the sword's aesthetics, the financial part to it, and the philosophy of your collection. With choices like that, you'd be happy no matter what Happy


This depends on how deep you want to look.

Large cavalry sword from this general era and type

vs.

The intricacies between the two, and the different focus of the ML vs the NG swords.

Don't get me wrong, guys... they are quite strikingly different - I know that. I share Alexi's passion for the ML pieces as well - man, do I adore my Brescia, and will lose my mind when I finally get that Svante... knowing the history and the handling characteristics of two REAL, EXISTING pieces... really amazing. It's why I'd be interested in the Solingen, even though I have something somewhat close in the Knight.

Likewise, though, I think I understand where Brian is coming from when he made his "same niche" statement. He's knocking it back to a higher level viewpoint to fill a need within his timeline/available funds/aesthetics... I've done the same thing - it's why I don't already have my Svante... I picked up a few others first. (I just can't stand NOT to have it much longer... Wink )

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 2:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Hate those decisions         Reply with quote

David Lannon wrote:
I also own the Crecy and I personally would choose it over the Ritter.


So is the NG Crecy shipping now? Cool sword.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Fri 22 Jul, 2005 4:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Deciding on My Next Two Albion Swords...         Reply with quote

My impressions and opinions on the ones I either own or have handled:

Jarl: thus far my favorite of the Next Gen Line. This one is truly a ground breaking sword in the production world. I've also owned custom swords of this type that weren't nearly as good. Anyone who has an interest in viking arms and history needs this one, simply a great sword.
Tritonia: this one is a very fascinating sword for me personally. I've never seen a sword that better illustrates how things like distribution of mass, distal and profile tapers, and etc. all have to work together to create a functional sword. All good sword exhibit this, but it's a very obvious and non-subtle feature of a sword that is anything but subtle. This one is on my "someday" list.
Duke: Never been wild about this one. It's a fine example of the type, but I find the Baron to be equally as impressive but with a higher aesthetic value. That's just personal preference though, and certainly no criticism of the design.
Sempach: I like this one a lot, and I usually don't go for these pointy types. This is one of those swords that caused me to re-evaluate the type. I like the subtle shaping of the sword's pommel and the austere sleekness of it's shape. Now that I've had it around for awhile I find myself liking it more and more.
Ritter: a nice one, and a big surprise. I have never liked the Type XI, but once again an accurate recreation of the type has caused me to change my mind. This one really grows on you, and anyone interested in the crusading era should have one.
Crecy: like the Knight this is a great one. I won't be buying one myself since I have the longsword section of my collection pretty well covered, but lovers of the H&H genre should give this one a serious look. Like the Knight, the Crecy is a bit of a jack-of-all-trades kind of design. It will fit well into a variety of styles and techniques, and it's size is well suited for the slight of build as well as the bigger folk. This is an ideal general purpose longsword and I predict that it will be one of Albions most popular models. This is a huge amount of sword for the price.

I've ordered the Munich myself simply because I love the aesthetic sense and proportion of it.

"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Sat 23 Jul, 2005 1:15 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'm still up in the air about Ritter vs. Crecy, but probably leaning more and more towards the Ritter. It does suit my focus better. Heck, if I got the Tritonia (or Duke) for my Free 7th and then purchased the Ritter, I'd have a darn-near complete early medieval sword library. Incidentally, I will be buying the Bayeaux without question when it comes out.
I like the aesthetics of both the Sempach and Landgraf. The pierced cross on the Landgraf is very nice, but the overall lines of the Sempach are very pleasing. This is a very tough call between the two.
I've noticed that the Jarl gets universally great reviews. I've been set on the Berserker for my first Viking sword since it is so unique, but the Jarl is just so darn nice looking.
The Duke continues to be hang on only on basis of cost and filling a need. It just doesn't seem to "do it" for me, which probably means it will get eliminated.
The Vassal fits pretty well into my time frame and would be a no-brainer for me, but for the price. Ouch!
Tritonia fits well in my collection, but I probably wouldn't think of springing for it without my $720 credit.

I appreciate everyone's input and I look forward to continued discussion.

Brian M
View user's profile Send private message
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Sun 24 Jul, 2005 3:05 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I've decided to go with Tritonia for my free 7th sword, and Ritter for my NG sale purchase. I'll probably branch out into later-period swords eventually, but I think for now it's best to fill out the pre-1300 time period, which is my primary interest. Thanks to everyone for their input. It was all helpful in making a decision.
Now the question is, what grip color for the Tritonia and Ritter? Big Grin Seems like the Ritter should have a black grip due to association with the Teutonic Knights. For the Tritonia my choices are brown (which is a very dark brown), oxblood (which looks medium-brown) and light-brown. I have all these but light-brown. What does the light-brown look like in person in comparison to what it looks like in the photo?

My next group of 7 probably will look like this:
Free 7th(from first group): Tritonia
1) Ritter
2) Bayeaux
3) Berserker
4) Jarl
5) Vassal -- Maybe. I will have to see it before deciding yes or no. If no, pick one of #6.
6) Pick one: Duke, Landgraf, Sempach, Crecy, Agincourt
Free 7th) Leave open for new developments. If nothing interesting, pick one of #6.

Cheers,
Brian M
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Sun 24 Jul, 2005 3:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Brian M wrote:
What does the light-brown look like in person in comparison to what it looks like in the photo?


Here's a recent photo of the current version of light brown:


Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Sun 24 Jul, 2005 4:00 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Brian M wrote:
Now the question is, what grip color for the Tritonia and Ritter? Big Grin Seems like the Ritter should have a black grip due to association with the Teutonic Knights. For the Tritonia my choices are brown (which is a very dark brown), oxblood (which looks medium-brown) and light-brown. I have all these but light-brown. What does the light-brown look like in person in comparison to what it looks like in the photo?


There's a degree of variation in all of the grips, no matter what you decide to get - nature of the beast with hand-crafted pieces using natural materials.

Here's another recent "light brown" - with a very red Regent. The colors in the photo are pretty close to real, at least on my couple of monitors.


(larger sized photo is located in my photo album under "arms")

Unless I'm mistaken, Brian, your choice for the Tritonia is black... or you could choose black, or possibly black. Razz I think all the Museum Line pieces are done only in black, with the exception of the Svante, which is a deep red-hued brown. I'm not a black-grip guy, as you can see from the pic above (and in the case of the Regent, I'm all up in your face with the red). I do like the black grips on the ML pieces though... with the exception of the SoSM, I have seen all of them.


On the lineup - looks like a really nice go-ahead plan, with some degree of flexibility built in. If only I could get my ducks in a row... they never seem to want to listen. On my complete "need one" list (including the pieces I have, but not the Maestro wants) I count 30+! You'd think I could line up the next few... Worried

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Sun 24 Jul, 2005 4:21 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Good pix of the light-brown grips. It seems to have gone more toward a relatively even medium-brown as opposed to the mottled light-brown in the photos. Looks good. I'll probably go with oxblood or light-brown, as the "brown" is a little too dark.
It would be unfortunate if the ML is only done with black. I can live with it but I'd rather have oxblood or light-brown. I'll have to ask.

Brian M
View user's profile Send private message
William Hurst




Location: California
Joined: 16 May 2005

Posts: 31

PostPosted: Sun 24 Jul, 2005 5:31 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I have an Oxblood grip on my Vinland, and let me say that you really need to see it in person to appreciate how nice it is. It gives a great aesthetic to the sword. It seems to mold dark red and black together, giving it a very interesting look. I was very hesitant to go with Oxblood when I ordered (since I had only seen the Vinland with black), but Albion surpassed my expectations. Personally, I think the Ritter would look great with Oxblood or light brown; so you really can't go wrong. Big Grin
View user's profile Send private message
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Sun 24 Jul, 2005 5:44 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

William Hurst wrote:
I have an Oxblood grip on my Vinland, and let me say that you really need to see it in person to appreciate how nice it is. It gives a great aesthetic to the sword. It seems to mold dark red and black together, giving it a very interesting look. I was very hesitant to go with Oxblood when I ordered (since I had only seen the Vinland with black), but Albion surpassed my expectations. Personally, I think the Ritter would look great with Oxblood or light brown; so you really can't go wrong. Big Grin


I bet that does really look sweet, William! If there's a way, I'm sure we'd all like to see some pics!

I agree the Ritter would look good in Oxblood or Campaign brown. My Ritter is red (though much different than either my red Knight or my red Regent). I think it's pretty nice dressed up that way, too... I'll have to post a good, clear pic of it when I get back. In fact, I need to revisit the "grip colors" thread and post some clear pics of all of the grips. It would also be alright in black... the one in Patrick and Joachim's review has a black grip. I think I'd steer clear of some more exotic colors like blue, green, or purple... just doesn't feel right to me on this piece.

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Deciding on My Next Two Albion Swords...
Page 1 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page 1, 2  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum