Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Dagger Blade Length Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Elling Polden




Location: Bergen, Norway
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,576

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 11:39 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Or they where just not added to the drawings. Kind of like scabards. Or they could be carried under the tunic, like the money purse...
"this [fight] looks curious, almost like a game. See, they are looking around them before they fall, to find a dry spot to fall on, or they are falling on their shields. Can you see blood on their cloths and weapons? No. This must be trickery."
-Reidar Sendeman, from King Sverre's Saga, 1201
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 12:01 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Most pre-14th century effigies don't illustrate a dagger being worn. Let's not fixate too much on one resource.
"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Joe Maccarrone




Location: Burien, WA USA
Joined: 19 Sep 2003

Posts: 190

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 7:06 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Patrick Kelly wrote:
I have been told that the cross-hilted daggers we medieval enthusiasts love so much were somewhat of a rare thing, with the ballock knife actually being far more common. Peter Johnsson has told me that nearly all of the originals he has examined have been single edged.


Interesting, and this points toward (egregious pun) a notion that has been growing on me: that large knives, suitable for fighting or utility, would have been much more common than cross-hilted daggers dedicated to fighting, due to their edge geometry.

As many in today's industry have pointed out, it's almost as expensive to make a cross-hilted dagger --akin to a miniature sword -- as it is to make a sword. You may be using a lot less steel, and less labor for the blade, but just as much labor on the cutler's end.

A good, stout, single-edged knife with a rigid blade and sharp point, with a pressed/glued/riveted handle, is just as effective in combat, far cheaper to make, and better suited for utility tasks. Perhaps the cross-hilted dagger was more of a luxury item. I do think everyone would have had a knife of some sort, but probably not a dagger, per se.

Coulda been a simple matter of economics... Big Grin
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Maccarrone




Location: Burien, WA USA
Joined: 19 Sep 2003

Posts: 190

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 7:16 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Worth noting, also, that many cross-hilted daggers were also single-edged, according to Oakeshott...
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 7:21 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Maybe a lot of those early single edged daggers were descendant of the earlier Sax ?

Also I can't help seeing the Sax as very close in shape and function to a Bowie knife with stylistic period differences.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Maccarrone




Location: Burien, WA USA
Joined: 19 Sep 2003

Posts: 190

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 8:27 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Yes, I think the descendants of the seax have been with us continually for the last 1000 years!
View user's profile Send private message
Geoffrey H





Joined: 21 Oct 2005

Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon 24 Oct, 2005 9:03 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The advantage of a single edge is that you can apply your thumb to the back of the blade, making a much more usefull tool. The same cannot be said for a double edged dagger. I would imagine that a well designed single edged dagger would be just about as effective in combat as a double edged.
Lurker
View user's profile Send private message
Mikko Kuusirati




Location: Finland
Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Reading list: 13 books

Posts: 1,081

PostPosted: Tue 25 Oct, 2005 3:20 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Geoffrey H wrote:
The advantage of a single edge is that you can apply your thumb to the back of the blade, making a much more usefull tool. The same cannot be said for a double edged dagger. I would imagine that a well designed single edged dagger would be just about as effective in combat as a double edged.

A double-edged blade might have a slight edge (hah!) over a single-edged one in penetration on a thrust or stab. A false-edged one, on the other hand, combines the best points (double hah!) of both.

"And sin, young man, is when you treat people like things. Including yourself. That's what sin is."
— Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Dagger Blade Length
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum