Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Destructive testing of two 17th cent breastplates Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Risto Rautiainen




Location: Kontiolahti, Finland
Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Reading list: 10 books

Posts: 176

PostPosted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 1:59 am    Post subject: Destructive testing of two 17th cent breastplates         Reply with quote

Couldn't find any old topics on this, so I started a new one.

I know many of you know of this test, but I figured not all of you have read it:

http://www.medievalproductions.nl/files/forsh...robat7.pdf

Quite an interesting read I have to say. Gives you quite a good idea of what different things you have to think about when doing destructive testing. Any comments?
View user's profile Send private message
Gordon Frye




Location: Kingston, Washington
Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Reading list: 15 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 1,191

PostPosted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 10:06 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks for posting that, Risto! I hadn't seen it before (as it is rather new, I must admit!). Looks to be an interesting read, and well worth further study.

In 1988 the curators at Graz did a destructive test on a breastplate made in Augsburg in 1570 or so, using period firearms. Not sure as of yet if this thesis contains that information, but it's a rather interesting study as well, along the same lines. (The wheellock pistol ball punctured the 1570 breastplate easily, BTW, though it was stopped by the heavy linen backing. Interesting.)

Cheers!

Gordon

"After God, we owe our victory to our Horses"
Gonsalo Jimenez de Quesada
http://www.renaissancesoldier.com/
http://historypundit.blogspot.com/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Daniel Staberg




Location: Gothenburg/Sweden
Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Likes: 2 pages
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 570

PostPosted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 11:03 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gordon Frye wrote:
Thanks for posting that, Risto! I hadn't seen it before (as it is rather new, I must admit!). Looks to be an interesting read, and well worth further study.

In 1988 the curators at Graz did a destructive test on a breastplate made in Augsburg in 1570 or so, using period firearms. Not sure as of yet if this thesis contains that information, but it's a rather interesting study as well, along the same lines. (The wheellock pistol ball punctured the 1570 breastplate easily, BTW, though it was stopped by the heavy linen backing. Interesting.)

Cheers!

Gordon

Well if a bullet spends all of it's energy punching through the armour I'd say that the armour has done it's job reasonably well. It'd also explain why troopers needed to replace armour a lot more often in the "Age of the Pistol" than before, I've seen Swedish documentation from 1627-1628 which shows how 40-70% of the troopers recieved new armour each year. Whiel soem must have been lsot due to carelessnes or ordianry wear and tear the destructive effects of comabt must have accoutned for a fair amount of armour which was at best of mid-level quality.

/Daniel
View user's profile Send private message
Shawn Shaw




Location: Boston, MA USA
Joined: 07 Jan 2006

Posts: 115

PostPosted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 12:21 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It is quite an interesting paper. I wish that the author had collected a little bit more data on the energy remaining in the projectile after perforating the breastplate(s). It would be interesting to then compare that to (presumably available) data on the energy needed to inflict damage on a human body.


It's interesting to note that a breastplate obeying the findings (Figure 35) of this paper would have to be about 6-8mm thick to survive a shot with a .22 caliber bullet at close range (~300 m/s). That's actually a bit better than what I would have expected, though I still don't believe I'll be chasing down too many gun-toting bad guys in my field plate...

:0)
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Benjamin H. Abbott




Location: New Mexico
Joined: 28 Feb 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,248

PostPosted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 12:58 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
It's interesting to note that a breastplate obeying the findings (Figure 35) of this paper would have to be about 6-8mm thick to survive a shot with a .22 caliber bullet at close range (~300 m/s). That's actually a bit better than what I would have expected, though I still don't believe I'll be chasing down too many gun-toting bad guys in my field plate...


Hmm... I guess it depends on exact round in question. I know the M-16 round used many years back could only penetrate 1mm of RHA. How does RHA compare to the steel used in plate armour? I know I've heard of people testing handguns against plate armour and supposedly the armour often does rather well. According Bert Hall, a 2.8-3mm breastplate from 1570 stopped a pistol shot going 436 m/s and with 907 joules of energy (the same test Gordon mentioned). That's quite a bit more punch than many modern handgun rounds.
View user's profile Send private message
Risto Rautiainen




Location: Kontiolahti, Finland
Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Reading list: 10 books

Posts: 176

PostPosted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 1:29 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gordon Frye wrote:
Thanks for posting that, Risto! I hadn't seen it before (as it is rather new, I must admit!). Looks to be an interesting read, and well worth further study.

In 1988 the curators at Graz did a destructive test on a breastplate made in Augsburg in 1570 or so, using period firearms. Not sure as of yet if this thesis contains that information, but it's a rather interesting study as well, along the same lines.


I somehow thought some of you lads would find this interesting Big Grin I´m not that intersted of guns, but I know some of you are. And yes there is information about the Graz test in this thesis.

It would indeed have been interesting to know how much power the penetrating shots had after passing through the breastplate. And it is really a shame that the second breastplate used in the test (BP2) is a 19th cent fake Mad
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Destructive testing of two 17th cent breastplates
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum