Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Armour from the 100 years war Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Hugh Knight




Location: San Bernardino, CA
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Reading list: 34 books

Posts: 739

PostPosted: Wed 05 Sep, 2007 11:48 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Alan Williams wrote:
Many thanks to Hugh and everybody for their help and information.
This certainly helps with some great links and period images.
I’m particularly interested in this type of harness http://www.lightlink.com/armory/bob.html as it’s very similar to a museum replica displayed in the Agincourt museum.
http://www.azincourt-medieval.com/


Alan,

For the harnesses of that period I strongly reccomend only the very high-end armorers, then you'll need to get an arming doublet and mail voiders from Historic Enterprises:
http://www.historicenterprises.com/cart.php?m...&c=120
http://www.historicenterprises.com/cart.php?m...t&c=25

I'll attach an effigy of one of my favorite harnesses of that period to this e-mail.



 Attachment: 103.58 KB
John Peryent, esquire to Henry V, ob. 1415 [ Download ]

Regards,
Hugh
www.schlachtschule.org
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Mikael Ranelius




Location: Sweden
Joined: 06 Mar 2007

Posts: 252

PostPosted: Thu 27 Sep, 2007 12:35 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Speaking of 14th century armour, would this arm harness by GDFB be appropriate for a late 14th century harness?
View user's profile Send private message
S. Mighton





Joined: 16 Aug 2007

Posts: 19

PostPosted: Thu 27 Sep, 2007 2:01 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Kind of off topic, but I just noticed this(http://www.themcs.org/armour/knights/2006%20M...1%2006.jpg) effigy of a knight who died in 1360 from that excellent link posted earlier. Does anyone here have an idea as to whether the striking black and gold colours of this man's armour would have been achieved by paint or by oxide-blackening and latten-gilding etc... Does anyone know of any evidence one way or the other?
View user's profile Send private message
Gregory J. Liebau




Location: Dinuba, CA
Joined: 27 Nov 2004

Posts: 669

PostPosted: Thu 27 Sep, 2007 2:30 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hugh Knight wrote:


Alan,

For the harnesses of that period I strongly reccomend only the very high-end armorers, then you'll need to get an arming doublet and mail voiders...


I've not come across any evidence for voiders this early on in the late 14th and early 15th century. Could you provide some examples as to why voiders would be used, rather than a full shirt (which seemed common until the mid-15th century, as far as I can tell).

-Gregory-

My Flickr Galleries - Travel, Nature & Things
View user's profile Send private message
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Thu 27 Sep, 2007 11:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gregory,

Now you have made an interesting comment.... It seems by both effigies and some other artwork that the mail shirts get smaller between 1350 and 1450. If you look at effigies of knights that lived anywhere between 1400-1450 it seems they do indeed get higher up the thigh and that most appear to have shorter sleeves. Part of the issue are the odd accounts that pop up indicating mail shirts to the knees still. I believe it is Warin who makes this statement of agincourt, yet if you look at the effigies around the time of and after agincourt few wear knee length hauberks. I have noted in inventories the hauberk or mail suit is not usually listed as to what its length is BUT often seems a mail skirt appears. This could just be extra mail for lighter fighting or for retainers though but it could also be to replace wearing a full shirt. At least into the 1st half of the 15th you can still find inventories of knights with basically full suits of armour with mail suits and a padded garment. Now the size might have changed greatly for the mail but there are moving toward less mail, just do not know when the jump is made.


AS far as only the high end armourers... Well depends on what you are going for. I'd stay away from having a well heat treated armour for most of the 14th and early 15th unless I represent someone with financial greatness. Now on the other hand the sacrifice for accuracy is worth the real costs if you plan on getting a hard beating often perhaps and the suit is the one and only you will buy for some duration of time. That said I'd simplify many of the harness bits of late 14th as most that remain are those of counts, dukes, kings, etc. On the other hand if you go with a high end armourer you will know that no matter what processes used and materials it will fit together and look right. It is your armour. I'd look through tons of effigies, narrow a time period down and settle. Once you get a few decades chosen then you may be able to start deciding on what you want to use for your harness.

RPM
View user's profile Send private message
Hugh Knight




Location: San Bernardino, CA
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Reading list: 34 books

Posts: 739

PostPosted: Fri 28 Sep, 2007 1:07 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gregory J. Liebau wrote:
I've not come across any evidence for voiders this early on in the late 14th and early 15th century. Could you provide some examples as to why voiders would be used, rather than a full shirt (which seemed common until the mid-15th century, as far as I can tell).


Frankly, the evidence either way is almost nil. We know that voiders were in use by the mid-15th century, but have no hard evidence as to how early they started being used.

But think about it: Why wear a full haubergeon under a complete armor (by which I mean a breast and back with a fauld and culet)? It doesn't get you anything since virtually nothing could penetrate the plate in the first place. And since full armor was being worn as early as the last decade of the 14th century (and probably earlier, maybe as far back as 1375, but I can prove it by the end of the century) and since these guys weren't stupid, it doesn't seem like a big leap.

I have been researching this as I'm having a Churburg #18 harness (c. 1415) made right now. I spoke with Robert MacPherson about this subject and he felt strongly that voiders were not unreasonable even as early as the late 14th C. We discussed their development and he pointed out an interesting Italian picture which shows a man at arms, already wearing a mail fauld (and yes, I know some Italian knights wore two layers of mail, but bear with me) who is pulling on what appears to be an abbreviated mail shirt. It seems as though it would cover the body just down below the arm openings on the breastplate.

Is this proof? Of course not, the picture isn't even that clear. But as I said, these guys weren't stupid, and voiders aren't a tough reach to condisre when you're wearing a full armor.



 Attachment: 26.68 KB
Italian Shrug.jpg


Regards,
Hugh
www.schlachtschule.org
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Armour from the 100 years war
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum