Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Appearance of modern mono-steel vs. historical steels Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Sat 29 May, 2010 11:18 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Maurizio D'Angelo wrote:

Is the famous sword of Vienna, S. Mauritius. Only with high magnification is more than 9000 pixels, so you can see the scrape.
With a normal resolution, these scratches are not visible, so.
Almost a contradiction: your photos are better quality than mine.
The continued reduction of the resolution gave a poor overall result, but the idea of the finish seems to have remained.
P.S.
No claim to post on this resolution. Happy


Maurizio,
If you'd like you can email me the full pic and I'll size it the best I can so it can be seen. If you're interested in that, PM me and I'll send you my email address.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Maurizio D'Angelo




Location: Italy
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Likes: 3 pages
Reading list: 3 books

Posts: 649

PostPosted: Sat 29 May, 2010 11:41 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Chad Arnow wrote:

Maurizio,
If you'd like you can email me the full pic and I'll size it the best I can so it can be seen.


I have restrictions from the museum, I have no problems sending to you, it only for study and personal, which is just great, a picture, if I remember correctly 120 Mb. My e-mail can send only 20 Mb. 4 photos fill a CD.
I received via ftp.

Ciao
Maurizio
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
David Sutton




Location: Bolton, UK
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Likes: 15 pages
Reading list: 39 books

Posts: 230

PostPosted: Sat 29 May, 2010 12:55 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Maurizio D'Angelo wrote:
A letter of gratitude. If it was common because show gratitude?
Maybe you can interpret that it was not the norm mirror polished sword?


I'm not at all suggesting that period swords were 'mirror polished' in the way that say a Windlass sword is. In fact a sword blade doesn't have to be finished to the degree of a mirror for you to see your face in it.

But Theodoric's letter might suggest that the finish of a sword blade was possibly a lot finer than we imagine; and we find on modern reproductions. Meader suggests that the polish of a sword was probably of great importance to the early medieval mind in a similar way that it was to the Japanese. By revealing the grain and pattern of the steel in such a way, it was possible to descern the quality of work. To show all this might well have required a Japanese-style polish.

Quote:
Perhaps a taste of the owner, but perhaps not manufacturing, apart from these specific swords, of course.
another thought, why, today, we use acids to highlight the texture of damask? No, it is less evident, probably.
just my thought


Yes the polish on these swords could well be of a high standard because they were given as expensive gifts made to impress. But then again swords of the this era were by their nature, as high status items, made to impress.

'Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all'

'To teach superstitions as truth is a most terrible thing'

Hypatia of Alexandria, c400AD
View user's profile Send private message
Hadrian Coffin
Industry Professional



Location: Oxford, England
Joined: 03 Apr 2008

Posts: 404

PostPosted: Sat 29 May, 2010 8:10 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
A puzzling aspect of it is that there are some small metal (or epoxy?) shapes between the guard and the blade shoulder corners. I wonder if these may be something the curator did to hold the restored assembly together?

Hello,
If I am interpreting what you are referring to correctly it is not epoxy, nor was it to hold the sword together. It is the "hook" holding the sword to the wall.
Cheers,
Hadrian

Historia magistra vitae est
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jared Smith




Location: Tennessee
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,532

PostPosted: Sun 30 May, 2010 6:21 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hadrian Coffin wrote:
It is the "hook" holding the sword to the wall.
Cheers,
Hadrian


Wow... I guess that must be it. I am not used to seeing a hook fit the piece so tightly.

Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Appearance of modern mono-steel vs. historical steels
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum