| Author |
Message |
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team
|
 Posted: Mon 29 Oct, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Ivo,
Do not rant on our forums. You're welcome to point out flaws in products, but always be polite and courteous. Your last post is not entirely polite and/or courteous.
ChadA
http://chadarnow.com/
|
|
    |
 |
Michal Plezia
Industry Professional
|
| Posted: Tue 30 Oct, 2007 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Look at those sketches.There is indeed some kind of fault on the guard.... 
www.elchon.com
Polish Guild of Knifemakers
The sword is a weapon for killing, the art of the sword is the art of killing. No matter what fancy words you use or what titles you put to
it that is the only truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Bruno Giordan
|
| Posted: Tue 30 Oct, 2007 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is an enhanced rendition of the original. Most likely the break in the sketch is a rendition of a chip on the statue's cross.
Part of the paint is gone, so giving the impression of a step.
Anyway i would have been a bit more careful before creating a cross with such an uncommon feature.
 Attachment: 47.14 KB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Smith
|
| Posted: Wed 06 Feb, 2008 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Has anyone gotten one of these swords, and seen how much room there is to re-peen the pommel once removed? I am thinking about getting one and removing the pommel, grip and guard. I would regrind the guard to where it was flush, instead of the wierd ridge along it, and probably put the angled bevel into the pommel. The thing I am really concerned about is messing with the balance to that degree. I like the look of the sword, but it seems to be decently tip heavy to begin with. Any suggestions about remedying this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a standard topic