Author |
Message |
Russ Ellis
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Wed 07 Dec, 2005 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nathan Robinson wrote: | Guys, I really don't want to get into the habit of bashing this stuff. We'll leave that to the other sites, ok?
If somebody finds pleasure in owning and collecting an $8 item that has a blade and hooks, so be it. |
I know it, my apologies... I just haven't seen that thing in years and couldn't resist. Will resist temptation harder in the future... As you say different strokes and all that...
TRITONWORKS Custom Scabbards
|
|
|
|
Jean Thibodeau
|
Posted: Wed 07 Dec, 2005 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gavin;
Very good points and very entertaining as well.
You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
|
|
|
|
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Wed 07 Dec, 2005 9:07 am Post subject: exotic weapons |
|
|
No Dachi's were used more than you might think. Temple swords were usually those that had highly decorated hilts and sheaths, usually ivory. No Dachi were were rather efective battle weapons, ranking close to yaris and naganatas. A large number of Japanese woodcuts show them being used in battle.
Hank Reinhardt
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Blair
|
Posted: Wed 07 Dec, 2005 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure that in the thirteenth century, firearms were considered by many to be "exotic" weapons. Against a man trained in the use of the longbow, a man using a handgonne was outgunned. Nowadays, their modern decendents are commonplace and easier to use. It's all about context and familiarity.
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." - The Lord Jesus Christ, from The Gospel According to Saint Matthew, chapter x, verse 34, Authorized Version of 1611
|
|
|
|
Felix Wang
|
Posted: Wed 07 Dec, 2005 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gavin, excellent post!
I would add one more class of exotic weapon, which has already been mentioned in other posts - the weapon is a modern fantasy, and was never used at all.
In your first class, there is the Abyssinian shotel, which seems to have been a sword designed precisely to reach around a large shield. The second class includes a number of "bright ideas" which didn't really work well. One of my favorites is the gun-shield (Tudor English, I believe). The idea of protecting yourself while shooting the other guy is appealing, but I suspect wasn't really practical.
In re weapons that are exotic because they are foreign: the nodachi is a good case, I think an Asian observer might think a zweihander to be exotic. The Mesoamerican maquahuitl is exotic to us, but in the absence of steel a wooden blade with obsidian worked quite well.
Pictueres of the Kiribati (aka Gilbert Islands) shark tooth sword: http://www.janeresture.com/kiriwars/main.htm with some interesting armour, and http://www.tribalmania.com/SHARKTOOTSWORDMARSHALL.htm (and this one's for sale, too!)
|
|
|
|
Hisham Gaballa
|
Posted: Wed 07 Dec, 2005 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Felix Wang wrote: | Gavin, excellent post!
I would add one more class of exotic weapon, which has already been mentioned in other posts - the weapon is a modern fantasy, and was never used at all.
In your first class, there is the Abyssinian shotel, which seems to have been a sword designed precisely to reach around a large shield. The second class includes a number of "bright ideas" which didn't really work well. One of my favorites is the gun-shield (Tudor English, I believe). The idea of protecting yourself while shooting the other guy is appealing, but I suspect wasn't really practical.
In re weapons that are exotic because they are foreign: the nodachi is a good case, I think an Asian observer might think a zweihander to be exotic. The Mesoamerican maquahuitl is exotic to us, but in the absence of steel a wooden blade with obsidian worked quite well.
Pictueres of the Kiribati (aka Gilbert Islands) shark tooth sword: http://www.janeresture.com/kiriwars/main.htm with some interesting armour, and http://www.tribalmania.com/SHARKTOOTSWORDMARSHALL.htm (and this one's for sale, too!) |
I think that is pretty much it. "Exotic weapons" are defined as unusual looking non-European weapons, or non-European weapons used in an unusual or atypical way.
Am I right in thinking it was a thread about the Indian pata that sparked this discussion?
|
|
|
|
Gavin Kisebach
|
Posted: Thu 08 Dec, 2005 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually Hisham, it was the thread on war mallets that I first heard that bit o' wit.
On the topic of Near Eastern and Asian weapons, I think these are plenty of widely accepted "standard" weapons, from the kris to the khopesh, the katana, the yari, et al.You could call the nunchakus "exotic", but most everyone I know, including people who would fall asleep at a sword convention, know exactly what they are. I don't think its simply a case of "Non-European" weapons being held up as bizarre or exotic. Reference the funky ceremonial polarms in the Doges Palace vs. a shamshir. Granted most people on the street would call a shamshir by the wrong name, but next to these badboys, its downright mundane. BTW thanks to Alex B. for that pic.
While I'm blathering, thanks to Hisham for all the insight into near eastern arms and armor. I greatly enjoy your posts, and have gained a lot of respect for that aspect of arms. OK thats off topic, but thanks anyway, I never knew how much I didn't know.
Attachment: 122.93 KB
There are only two kinds of scholars; those who love ideas and those who hate them. ~ Emile Chartier
|
|
|
|
Elling Polden
|
Posted: Thu 08 Dec, 2005 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
As previously mentioned, the purpose of the statement is to remind people not to get to enthusiastic about the combat abilities of "unusaual" weaponry.
For instance, a Sashmir isn't "unusual"; it was standard armament for about 1/3 of the world.
But it would apply to the Pata as it is a weapon that saw pretty limited use.
So "unusual" or "exotic" would refer to how much they where used, not where they come from
Guns are a example by its survival. Through battlefield use they proved effective, survived and evolved.
Some designs, such as the Duck's foot, or combination firearms, stayed uncommon. If they where fiendishly effective, they would probably be more common...
"this [fight] looks curious, almost like a game. See, they are looking around them before they fall, to find a dry spot to fall on, or they are falling on their shields. Can you see blood on their cloths and weapons? No. This must be trickery."
-Reidar Sendeman, from King Sverre's Saga, 1201
|
|
|
|
Gavin Kisebach
|
Posted: Thu 08 Dec, 2005 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahhh the Ducks Foot. I'd love a pic of that one.
There are only two kinds of scholars; those who love ideas and those who hate them. ~ Emile Chartier
|
|
|
|
Gavin Kisebach
|
Posted: Thu 08 Dec, 2005 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ooh Ooh this is cool. This is an exotic weapon. Downside is the liability.
Attachment: 26.99 KB
There are only two kinds of scholars; those who love ideas and those who hate them. ~ Emile Chartier
|
|
|
|
Anton de Vries
|
Posted: Thu 08 Dec, 2005 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gavin Kisebach wrote: | OThis is an exotic weapon. |
Awesome. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Alexander Hinman
|
Posted: Fri 09 Dec, 2005 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A weapon that fits into Gavin's C category is a crossbow I remember seeing in a Canadian museum (Perhaps the Canadian War Museum, I am not certain). It was taken from a Nazi soldier who had fashioned it out of a bed frame and the springs, wounded (or killed?) an enemy soldier before being captured. Sadly, I can't find any images of it, or even any documentation.
|
|
|
|
Bob Burns
|
Posted: Fri 09 Dec, 2005 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Gavin! Those are some cool looking polearms!
Bob
|
|
|
|
Gavin Kisebach
|
Posted: Fri 09 Dec, 2005 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | A weapon that fits into Gavin's C category |
Does this mean I get my own typology? I can hear it now... "according to Kisebach's typology of exotic weapons, this is a category B gimmick..." sweet.
There are only two kinds of scholars; those who love ideas and those who hate them. ~ Emile Chartier
|
|
|
|
Craig Peters
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|